
Short tandem repeats (STRs) are repetitive DNA sequences that contribute to genetic diversity and play a significant role in disease susceptibility. The human genome contains approximately 1.5 million STR loci, collectively covering around 3% of the total sequence. Certain repeat expansions can significantly impact cellular function by altering protein synthesis, impairing DNA repair, and leading to neurodegenerative and neuromuscular diseases. Traditional short-read sequencing struggles to accurately characterize STRs due to its limited read length, which limits the ability to resolve repeat expansions, increases mapping errors, and reduces sensitivity for detecting large insertions or interruptions. This review examines how long-read sequencing technologies, particularly Oxford Nanopore and PacBio, overcome these limitations by enabling direct sequencing of full STR regions with improved accuracy. We discuss challenges in sequencing, bioinformatics workflows, and the latest computational tools for STR detection. Additionally, we highlight the strengths and limitations of different methods, providing deeper insight into the future of STR genotyping.
Sequencing technologies, Bioinformatics tools, Variant detection, structural variants, bioinformatics tools, Long reads, QH426-470, short tandem repeats, Short tandem repeats, long reads, sequencing technologies, Genetics, Structural variants, variant detection
Sequencing technologies, Bioinformatics tools, Variant detection, structural variants, bioinformatics tools, Long reads, QH426-470, short tandem repeats, Short tandem repeats, long reads, sequencing technologies, Genetics, Structural variants, variant detection
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
