Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Lyse von Gallenblasensteinen mit Methyl-tert-butyl-ether: perkutan-transhepatisch oder transpapillär?

Authors: U. Stabenow-Lohbauer; T. Bozkurt; M. Langer; G. Lux;

Lyse von Gallenblasensteinen mit Methyl-tert-butyl-ether: perkutan-transhepatisch oder transpapillär?

Abstract

Thirty patients (23 women, 7 men, mean age 53 [24-77] years) with symptomatic radiolucent gallbladder stones were treated by litholysis with methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), introduced through a catheter inserted into the gallbladder either by the percutaneous-transhepatic route (n = 19) or the transpapillary route (n = 11). Correct placing of the catheter was more frequently successful by the percutaneous-transhepatic route than the transpapillary one (90 vs 73%). The duration of lysis (median: 7 h and 8 h, respectively) and the proportion of stones which were completely dissolved immediately after lysis (53 vs 55%) were similar in both groups. Supplemented by subsequent oral therapy, the success rate at 6 months was higher in the percutaneous-transhepatic group (83 vs 64%), however, recurrences were more frequent. In the percutaneous-transhepatic group there was one case of gall-bladder leak and one catheter dislocation, and in the transpapillary group there was one case of pancreatitis, one of induction of ether anaesthesia and one pulmonary embolism. MTBE lysis is a relatively speedy and effective mode of non-operative therapy for gall-bladder stones. The percutaneous-transhepatic method is suitable for younger patients with a normal gall-bladder. The transpapillary procedure is preferable for older patients, and also when gall-bladder puncture proves difficult or when there is concurrent choledocholithiasis.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!