
arXiv: 1911.04169
Recognising and locating image patches or sets of image features is an important task underlying much work in computer vision. Traditionally this has been accomplished using template matching. However, template matching is notoriously brittle in the face of changes in appearance caused by, for example, variations in viewpoint, partial occlusion, and non-rigid deformations. This article tests a method of template matching that is more tolerant to such changes in appearance and that can, therefore, more accurately identify image patches. In traditional template matching the comparison between a template and the image is independent of the other templates. In contrast, the method advocated here takes into account the evidence provided by the image for the template at each location and the full range of alternative explanations represented by the same template at other locations and by other templates. Specifically, the proposed method of template matching is performed using a form of probabilistic inference known as "explaining away". The algorithm used to implement explaining away has previously been used to simulate several neurobiological mechanisms, and been applied to image contour detection and pattern recognition tasks. Here it is applied for the first time to image patch matching, and is shown to produce superior results in comparison to the current state-of-the-art methods.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, 000, Image matching, Template matching, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV), Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Multi-view vision, Feature detection, Correspondence problem, Image registration
FOS: Computer and information sciences, 000, Image matching, Template matching, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV), Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Multi-view vision, Feature detection, Correspondence problem, Image registration
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 22 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
