Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Sparse matrix-vector multiply on the Texas Instruments C6678 Digital Signal Processor

Authors: Yang Gao; Jason D. Bakos;

Sparse matrix-vector multiply on the Texas Instruments C6678 Digital Signal Processor

Abstract

The Texas Instruments (TI) C6678 “Shannon” is TI's most recently-released Digital Signal Processor (DSP). Although its original purpose was voice and video encoding and decoding, it may have the potential to become a practical coprocessor for scientific computing. In this paper, we evaluate the C6678 in terms of its programming methodology, performance, and power efficiency. As a case study, we implemented a sparse matrix vector multiply (SpMV) kernel and used it to perform a comparative study against the NVIDIA Kepler GK104 and GK106 Graphical Processor Units. On the DSP, we take advantage of many of the C6678's features, including its VLIW and SIMD instruction set architecture, program-controlled scratchpad memory, and direct memory access (DMA) controller. We found that the DSP is unable to outperform the GPUs in raw performance but can achieve roughly equal power efficiency in Gflops/Watt. This is more impressive when considering that the DSP is manufactured in a 45 nm process while the GPUs are manufactured in a 28 nm process. We believe that subsequent DSPs, when manufactured in a modern fabrication process, may be more competitive with GPUs in power efficiency. We also found that, for this kernel, the DSP is able to achieve higher utilization of both its peak memory bandwidth and its functional units as compared with the GPUs. In this paper we describe our kernel and the programming techniques required to optimize its performance.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!