Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Neurochem...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Neurochemistry
Article . 1988 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Differential Release of Enkephalin and Enkephalin‐Containing Peptides from Perfused Cat Adrenal Glands

Authors: O, Vindrola; A, Ase; S, Finkielman; V E, Nahmod;

Differential Release of Enkephalin and Enkephalin‐Containing Peptides from Perfused Cat Adrenal Glands

Abstract

AbstractWe have compared the enkephalin‐like material derived from proenkephalin released from perfused cat adrenal glands stimulated with pilocarpine (5 X 10‐4M) and nicotine (5 X 10–6M). In addition, two doses of acetylcholine (10‐5 and 10‐4M) and 50 mM K+ were tested. Free Met‐enkephalin immunoreactivity and total Met‐enkephalin immunoreactivity, as determined by enzymatic digestion of large enkephalin‐containing fragments, were coreleased with catecholamines. Free Met‐enkephalin immunoreactivity represented 13% of total immunoreactivity for nicotinic stimulation, 46% for pilocarpine, 33% for 10‐5M acetylcholine, 22% for 10‐4M acetylcholine, and 16% for 50 mM K+. Analysis of the perfusate by gel filtration showed that 80% of the total Met‐enkephalin immunoreactivity whose release was induced by pilocarpine was eluted in fractions corresponding to fragments of low molecular weight, whereas these fractions accounted only for 10% of the total Met‐enkephalin immunoreactivity whose release was induced by nicotine. HPLC analysis of low‐molecular‐weight peptide fractions revealed that Met‐enkephalin, Met‐enkephalin‐Arg‐Gly‐Leu, and Met‐enkephalin‐Arg‐Phe represented 69% of total Met‐enkephalin immunoreactivity whose release was induced by pilocarpine. These results indicate that selective activation of muscarinic receptors is followed by release of low‐molecular‐weight material, whereas nicotine application also yielded high‐molecular‐weight peptides. Furthermore, increasing the acetylcholine concentration from 10‐5 to 10‐4M and using 50 mM K+ increased proportionally the high‐molecular‐weight peptide secretion. Results are discussed in relation to the existence of a heterogeneous population of granules, either in the same cell or in different cells, containing proenkephalin‐derived peptides. It appears that, under physiological conditions, different enkephalin‐containing peptides might be secreted from the cat adrenal gland. The response might also be modified when nonphysiologic stimuli are applied.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Nicotine, Enkephalin, Methionine, Pilocarpine, Enkephalins, Receptors, Muscarinic, Acetylcholine, Molecular Weight, Adrenal Glands, Cats, Chromatography, Gel, Potassium, Animals, Female, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    23
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
23
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!