
Transcription regulatory networks play a pivotal role in the development, function, and pathology of metazoan organisms. Such networks are comprised of protein–DNA interactions between transcription factors (TFs) and their target genes. An important question pertains to how the architecture of such networks relates to network functionality. Here, we show that a Caenorhabditis elegans core neuronal protein–DNA interaction network is organized into two TF modules. These modules contain TFs that bind to a relatively small number of target genes and are more systems specific than the TF hubs that connect the modules. Each module relates to different functional aspects of the network. One module contains TFs involved in reproduction and target genes that are expressed in neurons as well as in other tissues. The second module is enriched for paired homeodomain TFs and connects to target genes that are often exclusively neuronal. We find that paired homeodomain TFs are specifically expressed in C. elegans and mouse neurons, indicating that the neuronal function of paired homeodomains is evolutionarily conserved. Taken together, we show that a core neuronal C. elegans protein–DNA interaction network possesses TF modules that relate to different functional aspects of the complete network.
Neurons, 570, Genome, Life Sciences, 500, Nerve Tissue Proteins, DNA, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Polymerase Chain Reaction, DNA-Binding Proteins, Mice, Open Reading Frames, Gene Expression Regulation, Medicine and Health Sciences, Animals, Promoter Regions (Genetics), Caenorhabditis elegans, Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Transcription Factors
Neurons, 570, Genome, Life Sciences, 500, Nerve Tissue Proteins, DNA, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Polymerase Chain Reaction, DNA-Binding Proteins, Mice, Open Reading Frames, Gene Expression Regulation, Medicine and Health Sciences, Animals, Promoter Regions (Genetics), Caenorhabditis elegans, Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Transcription Factors
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 86 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
