
The objective of this article is to propose a conceptual framework for understanding the relationship {space-innovation} for current organizations in order to identify issues. The achievement of this objective requires a historical and critical reading of this relationship. The article is structured in three parts. In the first, the relationship is apprehended under the prism of the territory, seen as naturally innovative. In the second, this relationship is apprehended under the prism of the cluster and shows the need to ensure governance. In the third, we approach this relationship under the prism of the collaborative innovation space. Two particular issues currently facing organizations are detailed: (1) the obligation (or not) of organizations to open their borders and (2) the role of actors in the collaborations undertaken.JEL Codes: O310, O320
Organizations, JEL: O - Economic Development, Space, [SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance, 650, Technological Change, Issues, and Growth/O.O3 - Innovation • Research and Development • Technological Change • Intellectual Property Rights/O.O3.O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D, and Growth/O.O3 - Innovation • Research and Development • Technological Change • Intellectual Property Rights/O.O3.O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives, Territory, Innovation, [SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance
Organizations, JEL: O - Economic Development, Space, [SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance, 650, Technological Change, Issues, and Growth/O.O3 - Innovation • Research and Development • Technological Change • Intellectual Property Rights/O.O3.O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D, and Growth/O.O3 - Innovation • Research and Development • Technological Change • Intellectual Property Rights/O.O3.O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives, Territory, Innovation, [SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
