
handle: 10356/140030
State-of-the-art algorithms for blind image quality assessment (BIQA) typically have two categories. The first category approaches extract natural scene statistics (NSS) as features based on the statistical regularity of natural images. The second category approaches extract features by feature encoding with respect to a learned codebook. However, several problems need to be addressed in existing codebook-based BIQA methods. First, the high-dimensional codebook-based features are memory-consuming and have the risk of over-fitting. Second, there is a semantic gap between the constructed codebook by unsupervised learning and image quality. To address these problems, we propose a novel codebook-based BIQA method by optimizing multistage discriminative dictionaries (MSDDs). To be specific, MSDDs are learned by performing the label consistent K-SVD (LC-KSVD) algorithm in a stage-by-stage manner. For each stage, a new quality consistency constraint called “quality-discriminative regularization” term is introduced and incorporated into the reconstruction error term to form a unified objective function, which can be effectively solved by LC-KSVD for discriminative dictionary learning. Then, the latter stage takes the reconstruction residual data in the former stage as input based on which LC-KSVD is repeatedly performed until the final stage is reached. Once the MSDDs are learned, multistage feature encoding is performed to extract feature codes. Finally, the feature codes are concatenated across all stages and aggregated over the entire image for quality prediction via regression. The proposed method has been evaluated on five databases and experimental results well confirm its superiority over existing relevant BIQA methods.
Label Consistent K-SVD, :Computer science and engineering [Engineering], Blind Image Quality Assessment, Engineering::Computer science and engineering, 004
Label Consistent K-SVD, :Computer science and engineering [Engineering], Blind Image Quality Assessment, Engineering::Computer science and engineering, 004
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 176 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% |
