Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Angiographic Evaluation After Portal Blood Flow Preserving Operations

Authors: M A, Mercado; T, Takahashi; G, Rojas; E, Prado; J, Hernández-Ortiz; C, Chan; M, Tielve; +1 Authors

Angiographic Evaluation After Portal Blood Flow Preserving Operations

Abstract

We carried out a prospective study comparing postoperative portal angiographic characteristics in patients with hemorrhagic portal hypertension treated electively by two different portal blood flow preserving procedures. Between 1986 and 1991, a total of 81 patients underwent operation: 38 selective shunts and 43 Sugiura-Futagawa procedures. Cirrhosis was shown by biopsy in 50 cases, 26 of them secondary to alcoholism. We found rebleeding in 5% of the patients, incapacitating postoperative encephalopathy in 8%, and an operative mortality of 7%. Fifty-two cases were evaluated in the postoperative period with angiography; 21 patients treated with a Sugiura-Futagawa operation were excluded due to portal vein thrombosis shown in the preoperative studies. Postoperative portal vein thrombosis was found in 11 cases (21%) [seven cases in the Warren group (21%) and four cases in the Sugiura-Futagawa group (20%)]. Decreased portal vein diameter was seen in eight cases (15%). The two procedures maintained hepatopedal portal blood flow, and no change was seen in relation to the preoperative state in 66% of the operated patients. We found no significant differences between the two procedures. Selection of procedure depends on the individual characteristics of each patient.

Keywords

Adult, Portal Vein, Angiography, Thrombosis, Middle Aged, Portal System, Hypertension, Portal, Humans, Portasystemic Shunt, Surgical, Postoperative Period, Prospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!