
doi: 10.3390/sym11030343
The rapid, recent development of image recognition technologies has led to the widespread use of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in automated image classification and in the recognition of plant diseases. Aims: The aim of the present study was to develop a deep CNNs to identify tea plant disease types from leaf images. Materials: A CNNs model named LeafNet was developed with different sized feature extractor filters that automatically extract the features of tea plant diseases from images. DSIFT (dense scale-invariant feature transform) features are also extracted and used to construct a bag of visual words (BOVW) model that is then used to classify diseases via support vector machine(SVM) and multi-layer perceptron(MLP) classifiers. The performance of the three classifiers in disease recognition were then individually evaluated. Results: The LeafNet algorithm identified tea leaf diseases most accurately, with an average classification accuracy of 90.16%, while that of the SVM algorithm was 60.62% and that of the MLP algorithm was 70.77%. Conclusions: The LeafNet was clearly superior in the recognition of tea leaf diseases compared to the MLP and SVM algorithms. Consequently, the LeafNet can be used in future applications to improve the efficiency and accuracy of disease diagnoses in tea plants.
classification, SVM, convolutional neural networks, tea disease, DSIFT, MLP
classification, SVM, convolutional neural networks, tea disease, DSIFT, MLP
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 159 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
