Additional file 5: Table S4. of A decision analysis model for KEGG pathway analysis

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Research 01 Jan 2016Publisher:Figshare

Authors: Junli Du; Manlin Li; Zhifa Yuan; Mancai Guo; Jiuzhou Song; Xiaozhen Xie; Yulin Chen;

doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3636836_d9.v1 , 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3636836_d9

Additional file 5: Table S4. of A decision analysis model for KEGG pathway analysis

- Summary
- Related research
  (1)
- Metrics

Abstract

This file gives the comparison of the most impacted pathway subcategories and the most impacted secondary pathways (DC value ≥ 0.4) under decision analysis model and DIA method in Table S4 (a) and (b), respectively. In ‘Group’ column, ‘a’ showed that the pathway was the most impacted pathway under both decision analysis model and DIA method; ‘b’ showed that the pathway was the most impacted pathways only under decision analysis model, and was not under DIA method. ‘Rank DIA ’ was the order of mean impact value for the pathway. The sign “+” and “−” represent the up-regulating and down-regulating impact direction, respectively. (DOCX 30 kb)

1 Research products, page 1 of 1

A decision analysis model for KEGG pathway analysis
2016IsSupplementTo

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average

Found an issue? Give us feedback

Average

Green