Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Pharmacoepidemiology...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
Article . 1995 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Prescription drug screening for subsequent carcinogenicity

Authors: Stephen K. van den Eeden; Gary D. Friedman;

Prescription drug screening for subsequent carcinogenicity

Abstract

AbstractCancer occurrence was determined through 1988 among a cohort of 143,574 Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program members whose prescription records were computer‐stored between 1969–1973. Age‐ and gender‐adjusted standardized morbidity ratios (SMRs) were determined by dividing the number of cancers observed among one category of drug users by the number expected based on the cancer experience of the cohort as a whole. This hypothesis‐generating screening programme examined 215 drugs and 56 cancer sites. Although a large number of drug‐cancer associations were nominally statistically significant, many of these have been previously reported and the primary focus of this report is on new findings. Among the new findings considered intriguing were associations of indomethacin with stomach cancer (SMR = 1.51, p < 0.05), prednisone with myeloid leukemia (SMR = 2.27, p < 0.05) and lymphosarcoma (SMR = 2.22, p < 0.002), sulfamethoxazole with lymphosarcoma (SMR = 2.90, p < 0.01), thiazides (SMR = 1.80, p < 0.05) and isoniazid (SMR = 8.46, p < 0.05) with gallbladder cancer.Given the long follow‐up of this cohort, drug‐cancer relationships that are manifested only after latencies approaching two decades would have sufficient time to become apparent. However, since these data are based on pharmaceuticals dispensed over a short time period and because limited data on potential confounders were available, more definite investigations should follow‐up these results.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    12
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
12
Average
Top 10%
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!