Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Seismological Resear...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Seismological Research Letters
Article . 2015 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
Seismological Research Letters
Article . 2014 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The Seismic Noise Environment of Antarctica

Authors: Anthony, Robert E.; Aster, Richard C.; Wiens, Douglas; Nyblade, Andrew; Anandakrishnan, Sridhar; Huerta, Audrey D.; Winberry, J. Paul; +2 Authors

The Seismic Noise Environment of Antarctica

Abstract

Online Material: Table of station parameters; figures of mean acceleration power differences, interpolated noise maps. Seismographic coverage of Antarctica prior to 2007 consisted overwhelmingly of a handful of long running and sporadically deployed transient stations, many of which were principally collocated with scientific research stations. Despite very cold temperatures, sunless winters, challenging logistics, and extreme storms, recent developments in polar instrumentation driven by new scientific objectives have opened up the entirety of Antarctica to year‐round and continuous seismological observation (e.g., Nyblade et al. , 2012). Motivations for these recent studies include improved understanding of seismogenic, volcanic, tectonic and glaciological processes, heat flow, dynamic glaciological/ocean interactions, and mantle viscosity. Such studies contribute generally to improvements in understanding the geophysical, geological, and glaciological history of the continent and how these processes interact with the past and present state of the glaciological and climate system (e.g., Winberry et al. , 2009; Hansen et al. , 2010; West et al. , 2010; Winberry et al. , 2011; Heeszel et al. , 2013; Lough et al. , 2013; Chaput et al. , 2014; Accardo et al. , 2014), including processes relevant to glacial isostatic adjustment and sea level rise (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC] Report, 2007). In addition, microseisms arising from ocean wave activity contain useful climate proxy information on the state and variability of the relatively poorly sensed southern oceans (Aster et al. , 2008; Stutzmann et al. , 2009; Aster et al. , 2010), and such observations are sensitive to sea ice concentration and areal coverage in the polar regions (Grob et al. , 2011; Tsai and McNamara, 2011; Koch et al. , 2013). This characterization of the seismic noise environment of Antarctica, documentation of instrument performance, and comparisons of installation conditions (e.g., ice vaults vs. rock sites) is intended to facilitate optimization …

Country
United States
Keywords

noise, Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment, Glaciology, Polar Earth Observing Network, ice, information management, POLENET ANET, Oceanography, sea ice, instruments, technology, Antarctica, data management, glacial geology, seismicity, Geophysics and Seismology, boreholes, ice caps, Environmental Monitoring

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    59
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
59
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
bronze