
A challenge unique to psychology is objectively capturing ephemeral subjective states during controlled experiments. Large bodies of literature use metacognitive probes and self-reports in order to measure states of knowing, perceived progress, as well as the onset of phenomenologies such as surprise or insight. Here we evaluate the usefulness of a visceral measure—the dynamometer—in a problem solving context to detect feelings of progress and insight experiences. The continuous measure of hand grip strength provides multiple data points per second and effectively captures the onset of insight experiences in real-time, and maps onto other measures showing convergent validity. Our results highlight the importance of viewing metacognitions during problem solving and insight moments as dissociable events that show different behavioural outcomes. We also found evidence that the participants were embodying the intensity of the insight experience, despite not being instructed to do so. The dynamometer may be a useful tool in any context where metacognitions are monitored continuously, and is particularly well suited for research in problem solving and insight.
PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Motion Perception, Cognition and Perception, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Vision, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Perceptual Organization, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Touch, Taste, and Smell, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Cognition and Perception, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Embodied Cognition, Social and Behavioral Sciences, FOS: Psychology, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Audition, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Multisensory Integration, Psychology, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Picture Processing, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Vestibular Systems and Proprioception, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Action
PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Motion Perception, Cognition and Perception, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Vision, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Perceptual Organization, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Touch, Taste, and Smell, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Cognition and Perception, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Embodied Cognition, Social and Behavioral Sciences, FOS: Psychology, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Audition, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Multisensory Integration, Psychology, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Picture Processing, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Vestibular Systems and Proprioception, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Action
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
