
Aim. To compare the efficacy of combinational therapy with added bisoprolol or sotalol, in patients with ventricular rhythm disorders (VRD) via the assessment of regulatory-adaptive status (RAS).Material and methods. Sixty VRD patients with II-III Bigger type or I-IV Lown, and with essential systemic hypertension II-III stages and/or coronary heart disease, were randomized to two groups. Group 1 received bisoprolol 6,4±1,8 mg daily, group 2 — sotalol 166,7±49,4 mg daily. As combinational therapy, all patients were taking lisinopril (12,5±4,1 mg daily and 14,0±4,6 mg daily, respectively). At baseline and in 6 months of combinational therapy, the following measures were done: quantitative assessment of RAS (by the test with cardiorespiratory synchronism), echocardiography, threadmill-test, 6-minute walking test, Holter blood pressure and electrocardiography monitoring, life quality assessment.Results. Sotalol less prominently decreases RAS than bisoprolol. Both equally improved structural and functional condition of the heart, increased exercise tolerance, showed comparable hypotensive and antiarrhythmic effects. Sotalol, comparing to bisoprolol, improved life quality more significantly.Conclusion. In VRD patients with essential systemic hypertension and/or coronary heart diease, combinational therapy with sotalol, comparing to bisoprolol, might be more preferrable due to less negative influence on RAS.
ventricular rhythm disorders, RC666-701, bisoprolol, Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system, regulatory-adaptive status, sotalol
ventricular rhythm disorders, RC666-701, bisoprolol, Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system, regulatory-adaptive status, sotalol
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
