Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Graefe s Archive for...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Comparative efficacy and safety of micropulse transscleral laser cyclophotocoagulation using different duration protocols in eyes with good visual acuity

Authors: Oya Tekeli; Helin Ceren Köse;

Comparative efficacy and safety of micropulse transscleral laser cyclophotocoagulation using different duration protocols in eyes with good visual acuity

Abstract

To compare the success rates and safety of micropulse transscleral laser cyclophotocoagulation (MP-TSCPC) for the treatment of refractory glaucoma using the 240-s and 160-s duration protocols in eyes with good visual acuity.A retrospective analysis of patients with refractory glaucoma who underwent MP-TSCPC from December 2017 to September 2019 with baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of ≥ 20/60. Laser treatments for the moderate and short duration protocols were defined as 240 s and 160 s with settings of 2000 mW/Cm2 and a duty cycle of 31.3%. Follow-up examinations were performed regularly until 12 months after the procedure.Seventy-six eyes of 76 patients were included with BCVA ranging from 20/60 to 20/20. Forty-four eyes were treated with 240 s and 32 eyes were treated with 160-s duration protocols. There was no significant reduction in mean logMAR BCVA and visual field parameters from baseline at any follow-up point in both groups. Visual acuity remained unchanged or improved in 39 of 44 patients (88.6%) in 240-s group and in 28 of 32 patients (87.5%) in 160-s group. Seven of 44 eyes (15.9%) in 240-s group and 12 of 32 eyes (37.5%) in 160-s group required re-treatment for adequate IOP control. After the re-treatments, both protocols showed similar success rates of 79.5% in 240-s group and 75% in 160-s group at 12 months, respectively (p > 0.05).MP-TSCPC can be offered as a primary surgical treatment for the management of refractory glaucoma in patients with good visual acuity. Considering the high re-treatment rates in 160-s group, the 240-s duration protocol appears to be more effective than 160-s protocol for adequate IOP control.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Laser Coagulation, Treatment Outcome, Ciliary Body, Visual Acuity, Humans, Lasers, Semiconductor, Intraocular Pressure, Sclera, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    13
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
13
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!