Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Neurotransmitter Interactions and Responsivity to Cholinomimetic Agents

Authors: V. Haroutunian; A. C. Santucci; K. L. Davis;

Neurotransmitter Interactions and Responsivity to Cholinomimetic Agents

Abstract

There is now overwhelming evidence for the involvement of forebrain cholinergic systems in Alzheimer’s disease and the cognitive processes that subserve learning and memory (Perry et al., 1978; Bigl et al., 1987; Koshimura et al., 1987; Doucette et al., 1986; Ichimiya et al., 1986; Saper et al., 1985;Whitehouse, 1986; McGeer et al., 1984; Mann et al., 1986; Giacobini, 1990; Wenk et al., 1987). Support for the role of forebrain cholinergic systems in learning and memory can be gleaned from innumerable studies in which perturbation of forebrain cholinergic systems, whether through pharmacological means or lesion of the nucleus basalis of Meynert (nbM), has been demonstrated to profoundly impair learning and memory. This literature has been amply reviewed in recent articles and numerous chapters in this book (Wenk and Olton, 1987; Gold and Zornetzer, 1983; Dekker et al., 1991) and will not be reiterated here. In general, however, lesions of the nbM have been shown to impair performance on a very large variety of tasks and in a large and varied number of mammalian species. A smaller, but nevertheless voluminous, literature also attests to the ability of cholinomimetic agents such as physostigmine, oxotremorine, pilocarpine, etc. to at least partially reverse the learning and memory deficits induced by nbM lesions (Haroutunian et al., 1990c; Mandel et al., 1989; Fine et al., 1985; Bhat et al., 1990; Haroutunian et al., 1989b, 1990; Murray and Fibiger, 1985).

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!