Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Effect of postreconstruction filter strength on microcalcification detection at different imaging doses in digital breast tomosynthesis: human and model observer studies

Authors: Mini Das; Caitlin Connolly; Stephen J. Glick; Howard C. Gifford;

Effect of postreconstruction filter strength on microcalcification detection at different imaging doses in digital breast tomosynthesis: human and model observer studies

Abstract

Improved visibility of microcalcifications (MCs) and masses in tomographic breast imaging is a major concern in the medical imaging community, with intense research activity considering both hardware and processing approaches to the problem. Much of the research involves digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). In this paper, we present results of human-observer studies that investigated the effects of postreconstruction filter strength on MC detection in DBT images generated at various dose levels. The use of human observers poses severe limitations on objective-assessment studies involving multiple parameters and this paper also discusses our continued development of a visual-search mathematical model observer as a substitute for humans. In this work, DBT images were created using a rigorous computer simulation applied to realistic breast phantoms. Acquisitions with 0.7, 1.0 and 1.5 mGy doses were modeled and the Feldkamp FBP algorithm was used for reconstructions. A set of 3D Butterworth filters with cutoffs representing moderate (0.2 cycles/pixel, with pixel size = 100 microns) to no (0.5 cycles/pixel) postfiltering were tested. LROC studies were conducted with four observers. As expected, MC detectability fell off with reduced dose. At the same time, the best MC detection for a given dose was obtained with unfiltered images, suggesting that the increased noise levels associated with lower dose cannot be overcome with postfiltering. The model observer showed promising results in terms of agreement with the human observers. The causes for some points of disagreement merit examination.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    8
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
8
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!