
doi: 10.1007/bf02257798
pmid: 7995160
A prospective study of colorectal cancer (1987-1991) using flow cytometry was performed to determine the relationship of age with DNA index (DNA-I), sites of disease, Dukes stage, grade, and survival.The flow cytometry was performed on 138 fresh, unfixed, surgical specimens using 4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole, a DNA fluorochrome.The mean age was 66.9 (42.8 percent > or = 70; range, 22-92; median, 68) years, and 48.6 percent were female. The patients' stages were (in percent): A, 4.4; B, 53.0; C, 38.2; D, 4.4. Tumor grades of differentiation (in percent) were well, 14.4; moderate, 68.9; poor, 16.7; and sites (in percent) were: rectum, 19.6; sigmoid/left, 50.7; transverse/right, 29.0. Aneuploidy (DNA-I not equal to 1.0; CV, 3.5 percent) was found in 58.8 percent. Age (by decade of presentation) was compared with site and Dukes stage. Older patients had more transverse/right-sided lesions (P = 0.003). Patients with Dukes C and D tumors had a lower age (by decade of presentation) than patients with B2 lesions (P = 0.03). Age was not related to DNA-I or grade or DNA-I with sex, grade, site, stage, or survival (P > 0.05).This prospective study suggests that colorectal cancer tends to present at an earlier stage and in the more proximal colon in the older population. Because right-sided lesions are beyond the reach of sigmoidoscopy, these findings have prognostic and screening implications.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Ploidies, DNA, Neoplasm, Middle Aged, Flow Cytometry, Age Distribution, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Sex Distribution, Colorectal Neoplasms, Aged, Neoplasm Staging
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Ploidies, DNA, Neoplasm, Middle Aged, Flow Cytometry, Age Distribution, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Sex Distribution, Colorectal Neoplasms, Aged, Neoplasm Staging
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
