<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
pmid: 16192342
Gap junction proteins mediate electrical synaptic transmission. In Drosophila, flies carrying null mutations in the shakB locus, such as shakB2, have behavioral and electrophysiological defects in the giant fiber (GF) system neurocircuit consistent with a loss of transmission at electrical synapses. The shakB2mutation also affects seizure susceptibility. Mutant flies are especially seizure-resistant and have a high threshold to evoked seizures. In addition, in some double mutant combinations with “epilepsy” mutations, shakB2appears to act as a seizure-suppressor mutation: shakB2restores seizure susceptibility to the wild-type range in the double mutant. In double mutant combinations, shakB2completely suppresses seizures caused by slamdance ( sda) , knockdown ( kdn), and jitterbug ( jbug) mutations. Seizures caused by easily shocked ( eas) and technical knockout ( tko) mutations are partially suppressed by shakB2. Seizures caused by bang-sensitive ( bas2) and bang- senseless ( bss1, bss2alleles) mutations are not suppressed by shakB2. These results show the use of Drosophila as a model system for studying the kinds of genetic interactions responsible for seizure susceptibility, bringing us closer to unraveling the complexity of seizure disorders in humans.
Gap Junctions, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Synaptic Transmission, Connexins, Animals, Genetically Modified, Drosophila melanogaster, Seizures, Mutation, Animals, Drosophila Proteins, Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Gap Junctions, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Synaptic Transmission, Connexins, Animals, Genetically Modified, Drosophila melanogaster, Seizures, Mutation, Animals, Drosophila Proteins, Genetic Predisposition to Disease
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 34 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |