
In the paper, various laboratory pyrolytic methods were used to evaluate selected petroleum source rocks. The methods used are: Rock–Eval pyrolysis, Py–GC pyrolytic technique and TG/DTG/DSC. The experiments of the last method were performed according to three different procedures. Each of them provided different, specific data. The selected rock sample material was diversified in terms of stratigraphical position, structural unit and place of collection (outcrop or borehole). Based on the Rock–Eval analysis results, kerogen in samples can be classified as type II. Additional information on the quality of pyrolysis products was obtained from the Py–GC analysis. Thanks to the combination of the all three implemented pyrolytic techniques, the quality of the generation potential of the source rocks can be evaluated in details. In some samples, the oxidation and pyrolysis of organic matter occur in two stages, what is the evidence of the complex nature of the organic substance. The maximum of pyrolysis reaction is detected by TG/DTG measurement in the range of temperature from 450 to 580 °C, depending on the maturity of organic matter. The maturity level increases with the rock stratigraphic position. The proportions of loss in mass observed in respective stages of pyrolysis in course of TG/DTG experiment are in correspondence with the observations of the released fractions in the Py–GC analysis. The Carpathian Menilite shales could be classified as source rocks with high oil generation potential. Also, the Lower Silurian and Ordovician shales are characterized by high oil-producing potential with a lower content of mineral matter. Cambrian rocks show a different character and gas-prone generation potential.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
