Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Use of Vicryl (Polyglactin-910) Mesh Implant for Correcting Enophthalmos and Hypo-ophthalmos A Study of 16 Patients

Authors: J A, Mauriello; R, McShane; J, Voglino;

Use of Vicryl (Polyglactin-910) Mesh Implant for Correcting Enophthalmos and Hypo-ophthalmos A Study of 16 Patients

Abstract

Vicryl mesh (polyglactin-910) implants were used to reconstruct the orbital floor to correct enophthalmos or hypo-ophthalmos (globe ptosis) in 16 patients. The main advantages of Vicryl mesh over other alloplastic implants is that (a) it is absorbed by host tissue, and, once absorbed, it will not cause long-term complications; (b) it is layered and is cut from folded sheets into the appropriate size, shape, and thickness for the treatment of enophthalmos or hypo-ophthalmos; and (c) it is soft and pliable and, therefore, is unlikely to erode orbital structures. We followed all patients for a minimum period of 6 months after surgery and observed no significant adverse reactions to the mesh; 15 of the patients had good surgical results with a mean improvement of 1.4 mm in enophthalmos and 0.6 mm in hypo-ophthalmos. After surgery, one patient with combined medial wall and floor fractures developed enophthalmos that was 2 mm more severe than the degree of preoperative enophthalmos. Vicryl mesh should be considered an alternative to both nonautogenous implants and autogenous grafts in orbital floor fracture repair especially for correction of mild and possibly moderate degrees of enophthalmos and hypo-ophthalmos.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Adolescent, Prostheses and Implants, Enophthalmos, Postoperative Complications, Child, Preschool, Methods, Orbital Diseases, Humans, Child, Orbit, Orbital Fractures, Polyglactin 910

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    15
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
15
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!