
This paper presents an alternative way of random sampling of signals/images in the framework of compressed sensing. In spite of usual random samplers which take p measurements from the input signal, the proposed method uses M different samplers each taking p i ′(i = 1, 2, 3 … M) samples. Therefore, the overall number of samples will be q = M p′. Using this method a variable sampling criterion based on the content of the segments is achievable. Following this idea, the calculated measurement (or sensing) matrix is also more incoherent in columns comparing to other conventional methods which is a desired feature. Our experiments show that the reconstructed signal using this method has a better SNR and is more robust compared to the systems using one sampler.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
