Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Chromatog...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Chromatography A
Article . 2000 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Antibody immobilization to high-performance liquid chromatography supports

Authors: Julie D Beckwith; Elizabeth M. Karle; Bambi Reynolds; Amiee Jackson; David S. Hage; William Clarke;

Antibody immobilization to high-performance liquid chromatography supports

Abstract

This study examined various factors that affect the maximum amount of intact immunoglobulin G (IgG) or Fab fragments that can be covalently immobilized to silica and other HPLC-grade supports for use in immunoaffinity chromatography or immunoextractions. Factors that were considered included the amount of surface area available for immobilization, the pore size of the support, the type of immobilization method and the nature of the support matrix. The main factor in determining the extent of immobilization was found to be the relationship between the support's surface area and the ability of the IgG or Fab fragments to reach this surface. Access to the support surface was a function of the size of the protein being immobilized and the support porosity, with maximum immobilization being obtained with supports having pore sizes of approximately 300 A for intact IgG and 100 A for Fab fragments. Some differences in the maximum level of immobilization were noted between different coupling methods. Supports like Poros and Emphaze gave similar results to those seen with HPLC-grade silica when a comparison was made between materials with comparable pore sizes. Many of the trends observed in this work for IgG and Fab fragments should apply to other proteins that are to be immobilized to HPLC supports.

Keywords

Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments, Immunoglobulin G, Antibodies, Chromatography, Affinity, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    49
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
49
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!