
In this paper, we first present new upper and lower bounds for the rate loss of multiple description source codes (MDSCs). For a two-description MDSC (2DSC), the rate loss of description i with distortion Di is Li = Ri $R(Di ), i isin {1, 2}, where Ri is the rate of the ith description; the joint rate loss associated with decoding the two descriptions together to achieve central distortion D0 is L 0 = R1 + R2 - R(D0). We show that given any memoryless source with variance sigma2 and mean squared error distortion measure, for any optimal 2DSC, (a) 0 les L0 les 0.8802 if D0 les D1 + D2 - sigma2; (b) 0 les L1, L2 les 0.4401 if D0 ges (1/D1 + 1/D2 - 1/sigma2)-1; (c) 0 les L1, L2 les 0.3802 and R(max{D1, D2}) - 1 les L0 les R(max{D1, D2}) + 0.3802 otherwise. We also present a tighter bound on the distance between the El Gamal-Cover inner bound and the achievable region. In addition, these new bounds, which are easy to compute, inspire new designs of low-complexity near-optimal 2DSC. In essence, we demonstrate that any optimal 2DSC can be nearly separated into a multi-resolution source code and a traditional single-resolution code, and the resulting rate penalty for each description is less than 0.6901 bit/sample for general sources and less than 0.5 bit/sample for successively refinable sources
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
