Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
Sciencearrow_drop_down
Science
Article . 2002 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
Science
Article . 2002
ZENODO
Article . 2002
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Requirement for a Peptidoglycan Recognition Protein (PGRP) in Relish Activation and Antibacterial Immune Responses in Drosophila

Authors: Kathryn V. Anderson; Kathryn V. Anderson; Svenja Stöven; Thomas Werner; Kwang Min Choe; Kwang Min Choe; Dan Hultmark;

Requirement for a Peptidoglycan Recognition Protein (PGRP) in Relish Activation and Antibacterial Immune Responses in Drosophila

Abstract

Components of microbial cell walls are potent activators of innate immune responses in animals. For example, the mammalian TLR4 signaling pathway is activated by bacterial lipopolysaccharide and is required for resistance to infection by Gram-negative bacteria. Other components of microbial surfaces, such as peptidoglycan, are also potent activators of innate immune responses, but less is known about how those components activate host defense. Here we show that a peptidoglycan recognition protein, PGRP-LC, is absolutely required for the induction of antibacterial peptide genes in response to infection in Drosophila and acts by controlling activation of the NF-κB family transcription factor Relish.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Lipopolysaccharides, Insecta, Arthropoda, Active Transport, Cell Nucleus, Genes, Insect, Peptidoglycan, flies, Escherichia coli, Animalia, Animals, Drosophila Proteins, Protein Isoforms, Taxonomy, Cell Nucleus, Expressed Sequence Tags, Diptera, Biodiversity, Exons, Immunity, Innate, Alternative Splicing, Phenotype, Gene Expression Regulation, fruit flies, Mutation, Insect Proteins, Drosophila, Carrier Proteins, Antimicrobial Cationic Peptides

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    546
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 0.1%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
546
Top 1%
Top 1%
Top 0.1%
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?