
Abstract One of the key problems in designing and implementing graph analysis algorithms for distributed platforms is to find an optimal way of managing communication flows in the massively parallel processing network. Message‐passing and global synchronization are powerful abstractions in this regard, especially when used in combination. This paper studies the use of a hardware‐implemented refutable global barrier as a design optimization technique aimed at unifying these abstractions at the API level. The paper explores the trade‐offs between the related overheads and performance factors on a message‐passing prototype machine with 49,152 RISC‐V threads distributed over 48 FPGAs (called the Partially Ordered Event‐Triggered Systems platform). Our experiments show that some graph applications favour synchronized communication, but the effect is hard to predict in general because of the interplay between multiple hardware and software factors. A classifier model is therefore proposed and implemented to perform such a prediction based on the application graph topology parameters: graph diameter, degree of connectivity, and reconvergence metric. The presented experimental results demonstrate that the correct choice of communication mode, granted by the new model‐driven approach, helps to achieve 3.22 times faster computation time on average compared to the baseline platform operation.
TK7885-7895, Computer engineering. Computer hardware, 4009 Electronics, Sensors and Digital Hardware, 4606 Distributed Computing and Systems Software, 46 Information and Computing Sciences, Electronic computers. Computer science, QA75.5-76.95, 004, 40 Engineering
TK7885-7895, Computer engineering. Computer hardware, 4009 Electronics, Sensors and Digital Hardware, 4606 Distributed Computing and Systems Software, 46 Information and Computing Sciences, Electronic computers. Computer science, QA75.5-76.95, 004, 40 Engineering
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
