Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

A phase II study of the safety and efficacy of the MDR inhibitor VX-710 combined with doxorubicin and vincristine in small cell lung cancer

Authors: L. Gandhi; M. Harding; M. Neubauer; C. J. Langer; J. Crawford; M. Moore; J. Rooney; +4 Authors

A phase II study of the safety and efficacy of the MDR inhibitor VX-710 combined with doxorubicin and vincristine in small cell lung cancer

Abstract

17001 Background: Tumors with multidrug resistance (MDR) frequently show upregulation of efflux proteins MDR protein (MRP-1) and P-glycoprotein (Pgp). MDR represents a major obstacle to successful chemotherapy treatment and can be reversed in Pgp or MRP1-expressing cells by the MDR inhibitor VX-710. A phase II study was designed to evaluate the safety/tolerability and efficacy of VX-710 combined with doxorubicin (D) and vincristine (V) in patients (pts) with relapsed SCLC. Methods: Eligible pts had progressive, measurable disease and a PS <2 after response to 1st-line chemotherapy. Stage I safety evaluation was done with planned expansion to a second stage if 9 responses were confirmed in the first 35 pts. Pts were treated with VX-710 (120 mg/m2/h) for 72 hours with D (45 mg/m2) and V (1.4 mg/m2) given 4 hours after the start of VX-710. Pts were treated q 21 days until progression or intolerable adverse events (AEs). Severe neutropenia was noted in the first 15 pts, so the protocol was amended to include prophylactic G-CSF or ciprofloxacin. Interim analysis was performed after 36 pts were treated. Results: 36 pts were enrolled from 12/98 to 12/00. Neutropenia was the major toxicity, occurring in 25/36 (69%) pts. This was more severe (30% vs. 20% grade 4) and occurred earlier (58% vs. 38% in cycle 1) among the 15 pts enrolled prior to an amendment requiring neutropenia prophylaxis vs. those enrolled afterward. Other common treatment-related AE’s: asthenia (53%), nausea (50%), constipation (44%), alopecia (42%), dyspnea (42%), anemia (42%). 67% were grade 1 or 2 in severity. Four pts died on study or within 30 days of termination: 2 from infections likely related to therapy and 2 from disease progression. Among 32 evaluable pts, 7 (22%) had partial responses; 6 of these sustained responses through 6 cycles (with one response lasting 3 years). Three additional pts had unconfirmed responses. Median survival was 6 months (95% CI 4–7 months). Conclusions: The addition of VX-710 to D and V therapy did not improve anti-tumor activity or survival. Hematologic toxicity was severe, causing 2 pt deaths from neutopenic fever. Although there were some durable responses, response criteria were not met to proceed with stage 2. Further development with VX-710 has since stopped. [Table: see text]

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!