
doi: 10.1139/g01-006
pmid: 11341735
We have identified six restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers based on unique gene sequences on the X chromosome of Drosophila virilis and D. littoralis. The markers were localized by in situ hybridization on larval polytene chromosomes, and the conjugation of the X chromosomes of the two species was studied in salivary glands of interspecific hybrid female larvae. The gene arrangement of D. virilis and D. littoralis appeared to be very different at the proximal end of the X chromosome preventing recombination between RFLP markers located in this area. Simple quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis showed that five of our marker genes (including nonA and Dmca1A, previously found to affect male courtship song in D. melanogaster) are linked with a gene(s) having a major effect on species differences in the male courtship song between D. virilis and D. littoralis. This shows that the song gene(s) may be located inside a large X-chromosomal inversion in D. littoralis (as previously suggested), but that it may also be located on an area between this inversion and the centromere, close to nonA and Dmca1A. Localization of this gene or gene complex will be continued with the aid of our newly identified RFLP markers by making interspecific crosses between D. virilis group species with more similar X chromosomes.Key words: restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), in situ hybridization, Drosophila virilis.
Genetic Markers, Male, X Chromosome, Base Sequence, Genes, Insect, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Quantitative Trait, Heritable, Species Specificity, Animals, Drosophila, Female, Vocalization, Animal, Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length, DNA Primers
Genetic Markers, Male, X Chromosome, Base Sequence, Genes, Insect, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Quantitative Trait, Heritable, Species Specificity, Animals, Drosophila, Female, Vocalization, Animal, Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length, DNA Primers
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
