<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
The Jarzynski equality is one of the most widely celebrated and scrutinized nonequilibrium work theorems, relating free energy to the external work performed in nonequilibrium transitions. In practice, the required ensemble average of the Boltzmann weights of infinite nonequilibrium transitions is estimated as a finite sample average, resulting in the so‐called Jarzynski estimator, . Alternatively, the second‐order approximation of the Jarzynski equality, though seldom invoked, is exact for Gaussian distributions and gives rise to the Fluctuation‐Dissipation estimator . Here we derive the parametric maximum‐likelihood estimator (MLE) of the free energy considering unidirectional work distributions belonging to Gaussian or Gamma families, and compare this estimator to . We further consider bidirectional work distributions belonging to the same families, and compare the corresponding bidirectional to the Bennett acceptance ratio () estimator. We show that, for Gaussian unidirectional work distributions, is in fact the parametric MLE of the free energy, and as such, the most efficient estimator for this statistical family. We observe that and perform better than and , for unidirectional and bidirectional distributions, respectively. These results illustrate that the characterization of the underlying work distribution permits an optimal use of the Jarzynski equality. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
JARZYNSKI, STEERED MOLECULAR DYNAMICS, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.4, FREE ENERGY, MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
JARZYNSKI, STEERED MOLECULAR DYNAMICS, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.4, FREE ENERGY, MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 26 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |