Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Quantitative comparison of 99 Tc m -aerosol and 81 Kr m ventilation images

Authors: D Pavia; R. A. Francis; S W Clarke; J. E. Agnew;

Quantitative comparison of 99 Tc m -aerosol and 81 Kr m ventilation images

Abstract

Quantitative indices are described for assessing the distribution of ventilation imaging agents (radioaerosols, in particular) within the lung. They have been applied to images obtained with 99Tcm aerosol particles (0.5-2.0 micrometer diameter) and with 81Krm gas in 12 patients with a wide range of lung function. In patients with normal lung function aerosol distribution was similar to that of 81Krm. In patients with airways obstruction, the aerosol tended to penetrate less well than 81Krm to the lung periphery and to show a less homogeneous distribution there. Quantitative analysis confirms that the aerosol technique is an effective substitute for 81Krm in patients with normal lung function. When lung function is impaired aerosol images may still be valuable particularly in confirming a diagnosis of pulmonary embolism though they must be interpreted with caution in attempting to exclude that diagnosis. We conclude that small particle radioactive aerosols provide a readily available ventilation technique for clinical ventilation-perfusion imaging.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aerosols, Male, Radioisotopes, Krypton, Technetium, Middle Aged, Pentetic Acid, Humans, Technetium Tc 99m Pentetate, Female, Pulmonary Embolism, Radionuclide Imaging, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    30
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
30
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!