
We have tested the specificity and utility of more than 200 antibodies raised against 57 different histone modifications in Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans and human cells. Although most antibodies performed well, more than 25% failed specificity tests by dot blot or western blot. Among specific antibodies, more than 20% failed in chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments. We advise rigorous testing of histone-modification antibodies before use, and we provide a website for posting new test results (http://compbio.med.harvard.edu/antibodies/).
Quality Control, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, Blotting, Western, Immunoblotting, Biophysics, Medical and Health Sciences, Article, Antibodies, Histones, Antibody Specificity, Genetics, Animals, Drosophila Proteins, Caenorhabditis elegans, Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins, Biology, Protein Processing, Blotting, Post-Translational, Reproducibility of Results, Biological Sciences, Drosophila melanogaster, Chemical Sciences, Generic health relevance, Western, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Biotechnology, Developmental Biology
Quality Control, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, Blotting, Western, Immunoblotting, Biophysics, Medical and Health Sciences, Article, Antibodies, Histones, Antibody Specificity, Genetics, Animals, Drosophila Proteins, Caenorhabditis elegans, Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins, Biology, Protein Processing, Blotting, Post-Translational, Reproducibility of Results, Biological Sciences, Drosophila melanogaster, Chemical Sciences, Generic health relevance, Western, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Biotechnology, Developmental Biology
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 368 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
