
The use of binary transcriptional systems offers many advantages for experimentally manipulating gene activity, as exemplified by the success of the Gal4/UAS system in Drosophila . To expand the number of applications, a second independent transactivator (TA) is desirable. Here, we present the optimization of an additional system based on LexA and show how it can be applied. We developed a series of LexA TAs, selectively suppressible via Gal80, that exhibit high transcriptional activity and low detrimental effects when expressed in vivo. In combination with Gal4, an appropriately selected LexA TA permits to program cells with a distinct balance and independent outputs of the two TAs. We demonstrate how the two systems can be combined for manipulating communicating cell populations, converting transient tissue-specific expression patterns into heritable, constitutive activities, and defining cell territories by intersecting TA expression domains. Finally, we describe a versatile enhancer trap system that allows swapping TA and generating mosaics composed of Gal4 and LexA TA-expressing cells. The optimized LexA system facilitates precise analyses of complex biological phenomena and signaling pathways in Drosophila .
1000 Multidisciplinary, 10124 Institute of Molecular Life Sciences, Repressor Proteins, Drosophila melanogaster, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, SX00 SystemsX.ch, SX15 WingX, Genes, Reporter, Trans-Activators, 570 Life sciences; biology, Animals, Drosophila Proteins, Wings, Animal, Signal Transduction, Transcription Factors
1000 Multidisciplinary, 10124 Institute of Molecular Life Sciences, Repressor Proteins, Drosophila melanogaster, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, SX00 SystemsX.ch, SX15 WingX, Genes, Reporter, Trans-Activators, 570 Life sciences; biology, Animals, Drosophila Proteins, Wings, Animal, Signal Transduction, Transcription Factors
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 134 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
