
The influence of occupation and exposure to different agents on the risk of developing soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) was assessed in a case-control study based on 93 cases of STS (53 men and 40 women) and 721 controls (371 men and 350 women), conducted in northeastern Italy. No risk elevation was found in subjects employed in agriculture (odds ratio [OR] for greater than 10 years = 0.8, 95 percent confidence interval [CI] = 0.4-1.5), nor in those who reported exposure to pesticides or herbicides (OR = 0.4, CI = 0.1-1.2). Similarly, neither occupation in the furniture, upholstery, and mechanics industries, nor exposure to livestock or meat processing, wood dust, metal dust, and dyes or paints were associated with STS risk. Workers who reported exposure to chemical agents or to benzene or other solvents for more than 10 years had, respectively, a 1.8-fold (CI = 0.7-4.4) and a 2.2-fold (CI = 0.9-5.5) higher risk of developing STS. Although the small number of STS cases limits the interpretation of the study results, these findings weigh against the hypothesis that pesticides, herbicides, or other exposures related to agriculture, play an important role in the etiology of STS. The direct associations with exposure to chemical agents and benzene or other solvents, albiet not statistically significant, may provide a useful hint for future investigations.
Adult, Male, Risk, agriculture; benzene; case-control study; chemicals; Italy; occupation; soft-tissue sarcoma, Adolescent, Herbicides, Benzene, Sarcoma, Soft Tissue Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Agricultural Workers' Diseases, Italy, Case-Control Studies, Occupational Exposure, Humans, Female, Occupations, Pesticides, Aged
Adult, Male, Risk, agriculture; benzene; case-control study; chemicals; Italy; occupation; soft-tissue sarcoma, Adolescent, Herbicides, Benzene, Sarcoma, Soft Tissue Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Agricultural Workers' Diseases, Italy, Case-Control Studies, Occupational Exposure, Humans, Female, Occupations, Pesticides, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 31 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
