
pmid: 27836365
Transamniotic stem cell therapy (TRASCET) with amniotic fluid mesenchymal stem cells (afMSCs) has been shown to mitigate bowel damage in a rodent model of gastroschisis. As a prerequisite to clinical translation, we sought to study TRASCET in a larger animal model.New Zealand rabbit fetuses (n=64) with surgically created gastroschisis were divided into three groups. One group (untreated) had no further manipulations. Two groups received volume-matched intraamniotic injections of either saline or a suspension of afMSCs. Nonmanipulated fetuses served as controls. Histomorphologic measurements of intestinal damage, along with biochemical profiling of inflammation markers, were performed at term. Statistical comparisons were by Fisher's exact test, ANOVA and the Wald test (P<0.05).Overall survival was 62.5%. Segmental and total intestinal wall thicknesses were significantly decreased in the afMSC group compared with the untreated and saline groups (all P<0.001), with no significant differences between untreated and saline groups (P=0.24 to 1.00, depending on layer). Muscularis and serosal layers were significantly thicker in the afMSC group than in normal controls (P=0.045 and P<0.001, respectively).Concentrated intraamniotic injection of afMSC lessens, yet does not prevent, intestinal damage in a leporine model of gastroschisis. TRASCET may become a valuable strategy in the management of gastroschisis.N/A - animal/experimental studies.
Gastroschisis, Inflammation, Intestines, Disease Models, Animal, Animals, Female, Rabbits, Amniotic Fluid, Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation, Injections
Gastroschisis, Inflammation, Intestines, Disease Models, Animal, Animals, Female, Rabbits, Amniotic Fluid, Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation, Injections
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 22 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
