
Abstract Background While protein-protein docking is fundamental to our understanding of how proteins interact, scoring protein-protein complex conformations is a critical component of successful docking programs. Without accurate and efficient scoring functions to differentiate between native and non-native binding complexes, the accuracy of current docking tools cannot be guaranteed. Although many innovative scoring functions have been proposed, a good scoring function for docking remains elusive. Deep learning models offer alternatives to using explicit empirical or mathematical functions for scoring protein-protein complexes. Results In this study, we perform a comprehensive survey of the state-of-the-art scoring functions by considering the most popular and highly performant approaches, both classical and deep learning-based, for scoring protein-protein complexes. The methods were also compared based on their runtime as it directly impacts their use in large-scale docking applications. Conclusions We evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of classical and deep learning-based approaches across seven public and popular datasets to aid researchers in understanding the progress made in this field.
Protein-protein interactions, QH301-705.5, Protein Conformation, Research, Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics, R858-859.7, Proteins, Computational Biology, Deep learning, Protein surface properties, Molecular Docking Simulation, Deep Learning, Scoring functions, Molecular docking, Computational structural biology, Biology (General), Databases, Protein, Protein Binding
Protein-protein interactions, QH301-705.5, Protein Conformation, Research, Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics, R858-859.7, Proteins, Computational Biology, Deep learning, Protein surface properties, Molecular Docking Simulation, Deep Learning, Scoring functions, Molecular docking, Computational structural biology, Biology (General), Databases, Protein, Protein Binding
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
