<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Additional file 1: Figure S1. Separation of different FOS types using HPLC analysis. I-FOS InuGB-V3: Process solution of the I-FOS production from 800 g L-1 sucrose using crude inulosucrase. GFn I-FOS standards: 1-kestose (GF2), 1,1-kestotetraose (GF3) and 1,1,1-kestopentaose (GF4) (Megazyme). Fn L-FOS standards: levanbiose (F2) and levantriose (F3) (Megazyme). Fn + GFn L-FOS: L-FOS produced as described by Hövels et al. 2021. Sugar and FOS concentrations were determined via isocratic HPLC using column Shodex Ashiapak NH2P-50 4E with 58 % [v/v] acetonitrile at a flow rate of 0.7 mL min−1. Figure S2. Influence of Ca2+, Mg2+, Mn2+, and EDTA on sucrose transfructosylation and hydrolysis by crude inulosucrase. Crude enzyme (4000 U L−1) was added to prewarmed solutions of 570 g L−1 sucrose in 25 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 4.6) supplemented with 1 mM CaCl2, MgCl2, MnSO4, or EDTA. Activity assays were perfomed in biological triplicates at 37 °C in a 1 mL scale. Sucrose and fructose concentrations before and after 24 h of reaction time were determined via isocratic HPLC using 65 % [v/v] acetonitrile at a flow rate of 1 mL min−1. Figure S3. Conversion and hydrolysis of 570 (a) and 800 g L-1 (b) sucrose by crude InuGB-V3 during I-FOS production. The bioconversion reactions were started by adding 4000 or 6000 U L-1 crude inulosucrase to prewarmed solutions of 25 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.5) and 1 mM CaCl2 with 570 or 800 g L-1 sucrose, respectively. The reactions were perfomed in biological (570 g L−1 sucrose) or technical (800 g L−1 sucrose) triplicates at 40 °C at a 1 mL scale. Sugar and I-FOS concentrations were determined via isocratic HPLC using 58 % [v/v] acetonitrile at a flow rate of 0.7 mL min−1. Table S1. Product amounts of the I-FOS production reaction starting with 570 g L−1 sucrose after 18 hours and calculation of the recovery of the substrate. Table S2. Product amounts of the I-FOS production reaction starting with 800 g L−1 sucrose after 20 hours and calculation of the recovery of the substrate. Figure S4. Determination of a suitable ratio of activated charcoal to I-FOS-rich syrup. Bars show the percentage of the applied fructose, glucose, sucrose, and I-FOS adsorbed to the activated charcoal. 100 mg activated charcoal were incubated with varied volumes of process solution from the 10 L scale I-FOS production diluted in 1 mL water for 45 min at 40 °C and 250 rpm in a temperature-controlled shaking incubator. Sugar and I-FOS concentrations in the solution were determined via isocratic HPLC using 58 % [v/v] acetonitrile at a flow rate of 0.7 mL min−1. The experiment was perfomed in triplicates. Figure S5. Different elution protocols to purify I-FOS from I-FOS-rich syrup with activated charcoal. Diplayed are the amounts of the products fructose, glucose, sucrose, and I-FOS that eluted in the consecutive elution steps using various elution protocols. 100 mg activated charcoal was incubated with 21 μL process solution from the 10 L scale I-FOS production diluted in 1 mL water for 45 min at 40 °C and 250 rpm in a temperature-controlled shaking incubator (elution fraction 1). Elution steps were carried out at 40 °C, 250 rpm and the duration indicated in the graphs with 1 mL solvent (0 – 100 % ethanol [v/v]) each. Between the elution steps, the activated charcoal was separated from the elution fractions by centrifugation. Sugar and I-FOS concentrations were determined via isocratic HPLC using 58 % [v/v] acetonitrile at a flow rate of 0.7 mL min−1. The purifications depicted in (a) and (b) were perfomed in triplicates, experiments (c) and (d) in duplicates.
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |