
Abstract Reputation is a crucial asset for service organizations, in particular when actual service quality is hard to assess, e.g. in the context of hospitals. Employees and their recommendation intentions to other professionals and potential patients are crucial in the reputation building process. Against this background, we test with a quantitative-exploratory approach, for 1,022 employees in two German hospitals, how eleven dimensions of employees’ job satisfaction explain their recommendation intention on behalf of the hospital they work. Moreover, we explore this for different employee groups. Our results show that there are different employee job satisfaction dimensions explaining recommendation intention for different employee groups such as nurses, doctors, or employees in the administrative field. We frame our findings against the broad but scattered management literature that is relevant for job satisfaction and organizational reputation, and discuss implications for practice and further research.
502026 Human resource management, 509018 Knowledge management, 211903 Betriebswissenschaften, 506009 Organisation theory, 502026 Personalmanagement, reputation, Employee job satisfaction, Hospital management, 509018 Wissensmanagement, 505027 Administrative studies, 605005 Audience research, 211903 Science of management, 505027 Verwaltungslehre, Recommendation intention, 506009 Organisationstheorie, 605005 Publikumsforschung
502026 Human resource management, 509018 Knowledge management, 211903 Betriebswissenschaften, 506009 Organisation theory, 502026 Personalmanagement, reputation, Employee job satisfaction, Hospital management, 509018 Wissensmanagement, 505027 Administrative studies, 605005 Audience research, 211903 Science of management, 505027 Verwaltungslehre, Recommendation intention, 506009 Organisationstheorie, 605005 Publikumsforschung
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 31 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
