Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Long-term outcome following first clinically important deterioration in COPD

Authors: Ian Naya; Lee Tombs; Hana Mullerova; Chris Compton; Paul Jones;

Long-term outcome following first clinically important deterioration in COPD

Abstract

Introduction It is unknown if short-term worsening in COPD is a predictor of long-term poor outcome. We assessed whether worsening measured using a short-term composite measure (clinically important deterioration [CID]) would predict adverse outcomes in two large 3-year studies. Methods A CID was defined as any of: a decrease of ≥100mL in FEV1 or increase of ≥4 units in St George9s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score from baseline or a moderate/severe exacerbation at ≤6 months (index date [ID]) in TORCH and ≤12-months ID in ECLIPSE. Association between presence (+) and absence (-) of CID status at ID and long-term deterioration in FEV1, health-status, future risk of exacerbations and all-cause mortality was assessed post hoc from ID until end of follow-up. Only subjects that did not withdraw before the ID were included in the analysis. Results In total, 2870 of 5292 (54%) and 1442 of 1973 (73%) patients with data post ID were CID+ in TORCH and ECLIPSE, respectively. In both studies, CID+ patients had a clinically significant deficit in FEV1 and health-status and higher exacerbation risk (p<0.001 vs CID- group). All-cause mortality was also higher (p<0.05 vs CID- patients). Conclusion A CID that occurs within 6–12 months of follow-up is associated with sustained loss of lung function and health-status and increased exacerbation and all-cause mortality risk. Funded by GSK (NCT00268216, SCO30003; NCT00292552, SCO104960).

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!