Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Effects of hearing impairment on the perception and neural representation of time-varying spectral cues

Authors: Ashley W. Harkrider; Patrick N. Plyler; Mark S. Hedrick;

Effects of hearing impairment on the perception and neural representation of time-varying spectral cues

Abstract

Differences in phonetic boundaries versus normal controls suggest that listeners with hearing impairment (HI) have difficulty categorizing stop consonant place of articulation based solely on the dynamic spectral information present in the second formant transition (F2), even when the stimuli are amplified. This may be due to a degraded ability of the central auditory nervous system to process time-varying spectral cues despite ensuring overall audibility. However, increasing the overall level of the stimuli may not result in improved audibility of F2. To determine if spectral shaping of F2 improves performance of listeners with HI, psychometric functions and N1-P2 cortical responses were compared in 10 older listeners with normal hearing versus 10 older listeners with HI. Stimuli were synthetic consonant-vowels along a /ba/-/da/-/ga/ place-of-articulation continuum in an unshaped and shaped condition. Generally, behavioral and N1-P2 results indicate that, with shaping, categorization of /d/ and /g/ improves. These findings suggest that enhanced audibility of F2 through spectral shaping does improve perception of stop consonant stimuli. However, categorical boundaries for the individuals with HI are shifted lower in frequency with shaping for all phonemes versus normal controls, indicating that enhancing audibility improves but does not completely normalize categorization performance.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!