<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.840865
handle: 10230/1226 , 10419/25462
Most US credit card holders revolve high-interest debt, often combined with substantial (i) asset accumulation by retirement, and (ii) low-rate liquid assets. Hyperbolic discounting can resolve only the former puzzle (Laibson et al., 2003). Bertaut and Haliassos (2002) proposed an 'accountant-shopper'framework for the latter. The current paper builds, solves, and simulates a fully-specified accountant-shopper model, to show that this framework can actually generate both types of co-existence, as well as target credit card utilization rates consistent with Gross and Souleles (2002). The benchmark model is compared to setups without self-control problems, with alternative mechanisms, and with impatient but fully rational shoppers.
Credit Cards, 330, household portfolios, Debt, Credit cards, debt, self control, household portfolios, Microeconomics, G11, debt, USA, Kreditkarte, ddc:330, self control, Credit Cards,Debt,Self Control,Household Portfolios, Self Control, Haushalt, Schulden, Household Portfolios, credit cards, Theorie, Credit Cards, debt, self control, household portfolios, E21, jel: jel:E21, jel: jel:G11, ddc: ddc:330
Credit Cards, 330, household portfolios, Debt, Credit cards, debt, self control, household portfolios, Microeconomics, G11, debt, USA, Kreditkarte, ddc:330, self control, Credit Cards,Debt,Self Control,Household Portfolios, Self Control, Haushalt, Schulden, Household Portfolios, credit cards, Theorie, Credit Cards, debt, self control, household portfolios, E21, jel: jel:E21, jel: jel:G11, ddc: ddc:330
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |