Views provided by UsageCounts
BACKGROUND: What do the data presented in the CDC tables „Deaths involving coronavirus” mean? The one objective information is: „xxx thousands of people have died and being probably infected with Covid-19”.But how many of these people would for sure still live if not Covid-19? The aim of this paper is to present the math-logic method that makes possible to reveal the real number of lethal Covid-19 victims of in the U.S. METHODS: The ideas for solutions are original, mathematical – logical; there were used constructed by us estimators. The calculated data are usually slightly rounded, because the method presentation is the main aim of the article. FINDINGS: Under 10% of those reported as Covid-19 victims, in the US in 2020, died from Covid-19 complicity and all the rest would have died at the same or at a very close to identical time anyway (also without Covid-19) because their deaths resulted only from the normal age-structure of deaths in the United States, creating the average age of death in the given year. INTERPRETATION: The official number of Covid-19 victims is in a vast majority “the double counting” of those who would die whatsoever in the same time even without Covid-19. The ‘ex post’ analysis is necessary to discover the real number of deaths due to Covid-19. FUNDING: None.
Covid-19, estimators, math-logic method
Covid-19, estimators, math-logic method
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 149 |

Views provided by UsageCounts