Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Ophthalmologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Ophthalmology
Article . 2009 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

In Vivo Laser Confocal Microscopy after Non–Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty

Authors: Akira, Kobayashi; Hideaki, Yokogawa; Kazuhisa, Sugiyama;

In Vivo Laser Confocal Microscopy after Non–Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty

Abstract

To investigate in vivo corneal changes in patients with bullous keratopathy who underwent non-Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (nDSAEK) with the use of laser confocal microscopy.Single-center, prospective clinical study.Ten eyes (10 patients; 3 men and 7 women; mean age, 73.5+/-6.6 years [mean+/-standard deviation]) with bullous keratopathy were evaluated in this study.In vivo laser confocal microscopy was performed before and 1, 3, and 6 months after nDSAEK.Selected confocal images of corneal layers were evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively for degree of haze and density of deposits.Before surgery, the following were observed in all patients: corneal epithelial edema, subepithelial haze, keratocytes in a honeycomb pattern, and tiny needle-shaped materials in the stroma. After nDSAEK, subepithelial haze, donor-recipient interface haze, and interface particles were observed in all measurable cases; postoperative haze, interface particles, and needle-shaped materials decreased statistically significantly (P<0.05) over the course of follow-up. In addition, hyperreflective giant interface particles were observed after nDSAEK in all patients.In vivo laser confocal microscopy can identify subclinical corneal abnormalities after nDSAEK such as subepithelial haze, host-recipient interface haze, host stromal needle-shaped materials, and host-recipient interface particles with characteristic giant particles. Further studies with this technology in a large number of patients and long-term follow-up are needed to understand fully the long-term corneal stromal changes after nDSAEK.

Keywords

Aged, 80 and over, Male, Wound Healing, Microscopy, Confocal, Cell Transplantation, Corneal Stroma, Endothelium, Corneal, Epithelium, Corneal, Visual Acuity, Cell Count, Middle Aged, Corneal Diseases, Corneal Transplantation, Humans, Female, Postoperative Period, Prospective Studies, Descemet Membrane, Aged, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    28
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
28
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!