
To evaluate the analytical performance of an ELISA for the detection of anti-RNA polymerase III antibody (ARA) and to assess IIF as a method for identifying this antibody.A commercially available ELISA was used to assess the presence of ARA in sera from 1018 SSc patients. The sera had been divided into sub-populations based on the presence of specific autoantibodies, ANA pattern or the absence of both. Patients with ARA (n = 209) had been identified by characteristic ANA pattern by IIF on HEp-2 cell substrate [and additionally by radio-immunoprecipitation (IP) in 157/209 cases]. The remaining 809 SSc patients acted as a control group.Of 157 patients in whom ARA had been confirmed by IP, 150 were positive by ELISA providing a sensitivity of 96%. In the group where ARA had only been assessed by IIF, 100% (52/52) were ELISA positive. The ANA patterns indicating the presence of ARA were a fine-speckled nucleoplasmic stain with additional occasional bright dots, with or without concurrent punctate nucleolar staining. In the SSc control group, the ELISA attained a specificity of 98%, ARA being detected in 17/809 patients.We report the outcome of a study on a large population of SSc patients that shows the ARA ELISA to be of high analytical sensitivity and specificity. We confirm that there is minimal overlap between ARA and other SSc-specific autoantibodies. Additionally, it is demonstrated that the presence of ARA correlates with identifiable patterns by IIF on HEp-2 cell substrate.
Scleroderma, Systemic, Basic Science, Antibodies, Antinuclear, Humans, RNA Polymerase III, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect, Sensitivity and Specificity
Scleroderma, Systemic, Basic Science, Antibodies, Antinuclear, Humans, RNA Polymerase III, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect, Sensitivity and Specificity
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 42 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
