
To provide a National database, 1,410 unrelated hemophilia A (HA) patients were investigated using screening methods denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC), conformational-sensitive gel electrophoresis (CSGE)] and/or direct sequencing. F8 gene mutations were identified in 877 (81%), 146 (82%), and 133 (89%) families with severe, moderate, or mild HA, respectively. Among the 382 different mutations detected, 217 (57%) have not previously been reported in the F8 Haemophilia A Mutation, Structure, Test and Resource Site (HAMSTeRS) database. Mutations leading to a null allele accounted for 82, 15%, and less than 1% of severe, moderate, or mild HA, respectively. A missense mutation was identified in 16%, 68%, and 81% of severe, moderate, or mild HA, respectively. They included 105 missense mutations (48%), 41 small deletions (19%), 25 splice site mutations (12%), 24 nonsense mutations (11%), 18 insertions (8%), three large deletions (1%), and one deletion plus insertion. Unreported mutations were distributed throughout the F8 gene, as they affected all F8 exons but exon 20. We report a wide spectrum of mutations collected in a large National database. The type of mutation was a strong predictor of the clinical phenotype. This database is expected to considerably improve the genetic counseling and medical care of HA families in Italy.
Factor VIII, Protein Conformation, CSGE, Mutation, Missense, direct sequencing, Exons, Hemophilia A, F8 gene mutations; Haemophilia A; DHPLC; CSGE; direct sequencing, Alternative Splicing, Italy, DHPLC, Haemophilia A, Mutation, F8 gene mutations, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Sequence Deletion
Factor VIII, Protein Conformation, CSGE, Mutation, Missense, direct sequencing, Exons, Hemophilia A, F8 gene mutations; Haemophilia A; DHPLC; CSGE; direct sequencing, Alternative Splicing, Italy, DHPLC, Haemophilia A, Mutation, F8 gene mutations, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Sequence Deletion
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 41 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
