<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Gliomas are the most common and aggressive form of all brain tumors, with medial survival rates of less than two years for the highest grade. While accurate and reproducible segmentation of brain tumors is paramount for an effective treatment plan and diagnosis, automatic brain tumor segmentation is challenging because the lesion can appear anywhere in the brain with varying shapes and sizes from one patient to another. Moreover, segmentation is only done by analyzing pixel intensity values of surrounding tissues, and the diffusing nature of aggressive brain tumors makes it even more challenging to delineate tumor boundaries. Nevertheless, deep learning methods have superior performance in automatic brain tumor segmentation. However, their boost in performance comes at the cost of high computational complexity. This paper proposes efficient network architecture for 3D brain tumor segmentation, partially utilizing depthwise separable convolutions to reduce computational costs. The experimental results on the BraTS 2020 dataset show that our methods could achieve comparable results with the state-of-the-art methods with minimum computational complexity. Furthermore, we provide a critical analysis of the current efficient model designs. The code for this project is available at https://github.com/tmagadza/partialDepthwiseNet.
depth-wise separable convolution, deep learning, magnetic resonance imaging, Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering, 3D U-Net, Brain tumor segmentation, TK1-9971
depth-wise separable convolution, deep learning, magnetic resonance imaging, Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering, 3D U-Net, Brain tumor segmentation, TK1-9971
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |