
Summary Objective: The purpose of the study was the characterization of adverse events (AEs) after fine-needle aspiration biopsies (FNABs) of thyroid nodules, as well as possible predisposing factors. Methods: A total of 205 patients, each of whom had undergone an FNAB of a thyroid nodule, were included in the study (15 of whom were taking anticoagulant medication). The thyroid nodules were classified according to the ultrasound criteria of the American Thyroid Association (ATA). The FNABs were carried out by four trained nuclear medicine specialists from two institutions. To detect AEs, all patients were asked to fill out a standardized self-assessment questionnaire. Results: Out of 205 patients, 189 (92 %) reported no AEs. Fourteen patients (6.8 %) had mild or moderate AEs, such as short-term pain at the puncture site. In two patients (1 %), the AEs were classified as significant, and required medical followup, which revealed an intrathyroid hematoma in one patient and dysphonia in the other. All AEs were reversible. None of the patients taking anticoagulants experienced any AEs. The parameters of age, sex, nodule volume, ATA nodule type, needle size, and physician performing the biopsy were not predisposing factors for side effects (p = 0.54, p = 0.73, p = 0.75, p = 0.94, p = 0.35, and p = 0.24, respectively). Conclusions: The vast majority of patients tolerated the FNAB very well. AEs were seldom observed. A small number of patients experienced AEs that required no intervention or could be self-managed by the patient. Considering the almost negligible risk of the procedure, FNAB should be increasingly used for the classification of thyroid nodules.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
