
handle: 10451/41190
Traditional silo approaches to managing marine resources and anthropogenic activities are progressively being replaced by systemic and holistic ecosystem-based management. In Europe, authorities are increasingly realising the interconnected complexity and transboundary effects of maritime economic activities on each other and on the marine environment. Facilitating cross-border coordination and cooperation between neighbouring European Member States and their non-EU border countries on the implementation of maritime spatial planning (MSP) is essential in ensuring the sustainable management of the European marine environment. During the last decade, progressive efforts have been dedicated to coordinate national marine planning to ensure that there is a concerted, coherent and sustainable approach regarding the activities taking place in the European seas. The Maritime Spatial Planning Directive (2014/89/EU) states that regional coordination and cooperation between Member States is a requirement in the development and implementation of national maritime spatial plans, and specifically mentions the consideration of the Regional Sea Conventions (RSCs) that are in place in Europe. Through analysing the results of a small-scale survey under European MSP experts, the paper explores whether an increased involvement of the RSCs in regional cooperation on MSP is perceived as possible and/or desirable. The paper considers the (potential) role of the RSCs in the cross-border coordination of major maritime economic activities, as well as in cross-border MSP projects taking place in the European sea basins. The paper pays specific attention to the desirability and perceived challenges of such an increased role for the RSCs.
MarXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration|Environmental Policy, MarXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, Environmental Studies, MarXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration, Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Environmental Policy, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration|Environmental Policy, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Environmental Studies, MarXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Environmental Studies
MarXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration|Environmental Policy, MarXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, Environmental Studies, MarXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration, Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Environmental Policy, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration|Environmental Policy, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Environmental Studies, MarXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Environmental Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
