
ABSTRACT Replication of viruses in species other than their natural hosts is frequently limited by entry and postentry barriers. The coronavirus that causes severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV) utilizes the receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) to infect cells. Here we compare human, mouse, and rat ACE2 molecules for their ability to serve as receptors for SARS-CoV. We found that, compared to human ACE2, murine ACE2 less efficiently bound the S1 domain of SARS-CoV and supported less-efficient S protein-mediated infection. Rat ACE2 was even less efficient, at near background levels for both activities. Murine 3T3 cells expressing human ACE2 supported SARS-CoV replication, whereas replication was less than 10% as efficient in the same cells expressing murine ACE2. These data imply that a mouse transgenically expressing human ACE2 may be a useful animal model of SARS.
Immunology, 3T3 Cells, Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A, SARS Virus, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, Virus Replication, Pediatrics, Microbiology, *Virus Replication, Cell Line, Rats, Mice, Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus, Insect Science, Virology, Endopeptidases, Animals, Humans, Immunology and Infectious Disease
Immunology, 3T3 Cells, Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A, SARS Virus, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, Virus Replication, Pediatrics, Microbiology, *Virus Replication, Cell Line, Rats, Mice, Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus, Insect Science, Virology, Endopeptidases, Animals, Humans, Immunology and Infectious Disease
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 150 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
