
pmid: 28358253
To compare the results of different protocols for accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) in patients with progressive keratoconus.This prospective comparative study involved 40 patients treated with intended UV-A radiance of 5.4 J/cm2 in 74 eyes (Group 1) and 42 patients treated with radiance of 7.2 J/cm2 in 72 eyes (Group 2). Visual acuity, subjective manifest refraction and corneal topography were analyzed before and 12 months after surgery in both groups. Postoperative complications were also noted. The results of the two protocols were statistically compared.There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity or corneal topography pre- or postoperatively. The differences in keratometric readings (K apex, SimK1 and SimK2) and refractive results were not significant.The application of total intended UV-A radiance of 5.4 J/cm2 or 7.2 J/cm2 for accelerated CXL in patients with progressive keratoconus resulted in similar refractive and topographic outcomes.
Male, Time Factors, Ultraviolet Rays, Visual Acuity, Corneal Topography, Keratoconus, Refraction, Ocular, Cornea, Young Adult, Cross-Linking Reagents, Treatment Outcome, Photochemotherapy, Humans, Female, Collagen, Prospective Studies, Follow-Up Studies
Male, Time Factors, Ultraviolet Rays, Visual Acuity, Corneal Topography, Keratoconus, Refraction, Ocular, Cornea, Young Adult, Cross-Linking Reagents, Treatment Outcome, Photochemotherapy, Humans, Female, Collagen, Prospective Studies, Follow-Up Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
